Since 1998...

Play chess with people from all around the world!

Chess Book Store - Correspondence Chess Books, Tournament Booklets and More!

Contact Admin |  TCCMB-A |  TCCMB-B |  Friends of TCCMBCompleted TCCMB Exhibition Matches  
The Correspondence Chess Place |  The Campbell Report |  Ralph Marconi's Chess Pages  | Interactive Fiction
 TCCMB Photo Album/Contact List | Chess Webmaster Tools | ICCF WebChess Server  | CNN Headline News

TCCMB Chess Quote of the Week
"It is astonishing how much hot water a master can wade into in the first dozen moves, despite a century of opening study."    
William Napier

Pending TCCMB Exhibition Matches!  |  TCCMB FAQ/Terms of Use |  Visit CC.COM's Online Store!

TCCMB Video (Windows Media Player)

Hey - We're all at the other forum - come and join us!

Welcome to TCCMB. First time users - see the FAQ/Terms of use. In order to post here, you need the password.

Forum: General Forum
Start a New Topic 
View Entire Thread
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: poor criticism

"I suspect that the reason for delays in some games is not the player's style but other circumstances hard to predict."

Hi Gino,

That's absolutely true! When I have 50 games at a time (as is currently the case with my games load), if I use 0-1 days in a particular game it's certain that I haven't spend much time on it. But if I answer 7-10 days later, it might be because I have spent 7-10 days on another more important game first and let the other game wait ...
So the used time depends on factors outside the game as well.

But returning to the issue of how much time a tournament can take, then one must acknowledge that this depends how long the last games take.
Therefore it's fundamentally a matter of game duration and its statistical distrubution function.
On the other hand there are players who systematically take much time and/or even stall their games when they like (contrary to the average behaviour of players). I consider these games as outliers in the distribution, against which my rule change proposals were meant.

The average player will not suffer from these proposals. But a general change from 50/10 to 40/10 would certainly affect all players and the games load as well. I therefore excluded these kind of proposals.

Best wishes,

Re: poor criticism - by Ron Langeveld - Jun 4, 2007 11:26pm
Re: Re: poor criticism - by Gino - Jun 6, 2007 2:54pm
Get your own FREE Forum today! 
Report Content ·  · Online Photo Albums   Email Forms   Free Guestbooks   Free Web Hosting 
powered by Powered by Bravenet

FAQ/Terms of Use |  Chess Limericks |  Guestbook |  TCCMB Links | |  Play Java Blitz Now!