Since 1998...

Play chess with people from all around the world!

Chess Book Store - Correspondence Chess Books, Tournament Booklets and More!

Contact Admin |  TCCMB-A |  TCCMB-B |  Friends of TCCMBCompleted TCCMB Exhibition Matches  
The Correspondence Chess Place |  The Campbell Report |  Ralph Marconi's Chess Pages  | Interactive Fiction
 TCCMB Photo Album/Contact List | Chess Webmaster Tools | ICCF WebChess Server  | CNN Headline News

TCCMB Chess Quote of the Week
"It is astonishing how much hot water a master can wade into in the first dozen moves, despite a century of opening study."    
William Napier

Pending TCCMB Exhibition Matches!  |  TCCMB FAQ/Terms of Use |  Visit CC.COM's Online Store!

TCCMB Video (Windows Media Player)

Hey - We're all at the other forum - come and join us!

Welcome to TCCMB. First time users - see the FAQ/Terms of use. In order to post here, you need the password.

Forum: General Forum
Start a New Topic 
   Board|Threaded
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
Re: Refresh your memory!

Let's run through this slowly, so that maybe you will be able to follow it.

1. The current World Chapionships are generally too weak, due to inaction by ICCF Officials for many years. IMO, and that of others, no WCh Final should be as low as Cat13, or even 14.

2. This does not deny the rights of such players to play in these tournaments. It's not their fault. Even in the circumstances, to have made the final is a fine achievement. Just not as fine as it might have been. And the finals are not as fine as they might have been either.

3. For instance in XXI 3/4 we have two sections with Category 12, and three with Category 10.

4. It is clear that the players have an easier task in the latter three than the former two. Now if you don't think that situation is daft, tell us why.

5. Nowhere do I say that the players don't have a right to play. Through ICCF ineptitude they have earnt the right. We have actually been all through this before, concerning the rights of current qualifiers that have been abrogated by further ineptitudes.

6. There are some players that never should have earnt final places. But it is not a player's fault if a pair of withdrawals gift him a final spot. Nor is it his fault if the tournament is too weak or multiple ties are allowed to progress. The fact that his progress has been too easy is beyond his control.

7. I don't "look down" on players in this situation. This is just use of emotive rhetoric. I don't even envy them their good fortune. I just think that they have earnt the right to participate in a devalued championship.

8. ICCF should have juggled players, just like they do in SFs and 3/4s (normally), in order to maintain the strength of finals. If that meant delaying a final for a few weeks or months, then IMO it would have been a small price to pay. And if it meant that one or two players had to wait until the next final, then so be it too. It's better than having finals that are no stronger than most GM invitationals.

Why bother? - by Per Söderberg - Mar 9, 2007 9:10am
Learning basic stats from Grayling - by Ken Reinhart - Mar 8, 2007 1:38pm
Get your own FREE Forum today! 
Report Content ·  · Web Calendars   Online Photo Albums   Free Blogs   Free Guestbooks 
powered by Powered by Bravenet bravenet.com

FAQ/Terms of Use |  Chess Limericks |  Guestbook |  TCCMB Links | |  Play Java Blitz Now!