Sheffield Indexers

Welcome to our forum ~ please post your questions below.

Sheffield Indexers
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
Re: George Wilson bn abt 1842 Bradfield?

Hi Elaine don't know if this is any help to Terry!
George Wilson born Bradfield 1820 is my 2x Great-uncle, Zacharia Wilson born 1824 is my 2x Great Grandfather. George and wife Mary are living at 10 Wood Road, Ecclesfield in 1891.

Re: George Wilson bn abt 1842 Bradfield?

Are there any Male descendants you know of for DNA purposes, I could not find any beyond later 1900's

Re: George Wilson bn abt 1842 Bradfield?

Hi Will,

Terry as you saw will answer your questions re this family.

Just wish it was my Ecclesfield Wilson line. LOL.

Robert & Ann of Dam Flask had six children of which George 1820 & Zachariah 1823
were two of them. Is that what you have in your tree?

BUT it's trying to connect the 1842 George Wilson from Bradfield to parents that we are trying to do.


Elaine.

Re: George Wilson bn abt 1842 Bradfield?

Can't help you there Terry! Don't know of anyone in my Wilson line that has taken a DNA test.

Re: George Wilson bn abt 1842 Bradfield?

Thanks Will, I had a look at Zachs descendants trying to trace a Male line but found
it dwindling in the last century. However if we find any positive link to Damflask George 1842 the Kansas line would want to know. I would be grateful if you would let me know how you are descended from Z as there are many of you on Ancestry. Best contact is email t.anderson@btinternet thanks
T

Re: George Wilson bn abt 1842 Bradfield?

The idea that the correct George Wilson was born in Bradfield in 1842 has no supporting evidence. There is no Birth Reg, and there is no supporting evidence in the 1851,61 or 71 censuses.
The 1861 Census for the Crapper family in Storrs shows that they were educating their children to age 12 so Lydia Mary would probably leave school in 1868 and start some sort of job somewhere,
She is clearly missing from the family in 1871 (she would be 14) and the next sighting of her is 1877 on a boat to New York from Liverpool (to join and marry George). She was just 21 (though she said 25).
The first positive sighting of George (a MERCHANT) is on a boat from PLYMOUTH in 1866 to New York.
Try this scenario:
It is most likely that Lydia first met George between 1868 and 1875 and by 1876 they wanted to marry and emigrate but her parents would not permit her to marry. Until she was 21 in June 1877 they could prevent the marriage.
So George went ahead to USA when she was 19/20 and she followed about a year later and they married.
In all the published info (Ancestry Tree) I can see no hard evidence of where George was born (other than England). (Yes his descendants said in 1990 that he had family in Yorkshire but it is easy to see how that could be an error)
You need to go back to square one on George.
As a Merchant he may have travelled anywhere in England, wherever his roots.

Did he go to his family in 1876 to say goodbye before CONVENIENTLY travelling to PLYMOUTH for his Atlantic crossing?
Dave
PS, Q2 1876 was a traumatic time for the Crapper family of Storrs, Lydia’s sister Ruth (26) died and her sister Naomi (24) gave birth to illegitimate twin girls.

Re: George Wilson bn abt 1842 Bradfield?

I like the general scenario but do have a George 30yrs publican bn Damflask in the 1871 census at Barkers Pool, & while the year appears 'out' this could be error or 'rounding up'. Reference to the Cowley County Heritage Book, a contemporary account of migrant families compiled between 1882 & 1901 indicates his 'family in Yorkshire'.
That together with family memories, verbal & written, seems to corroborate the few facts we have. As for saying goodbye to family en route to Plymouth is highly unlikely given what the descendants know of the embittered attitude to their forebears.
Unfortunately we have always been at square 1 on George, the Damflask line only being a good prospect based on geographic & social links,together with what we know of the Crappers insular marriage liaisons. There is also the influx of navvies & clayminers to consider which at this time is impractical. I also like the Holdsworth & Ecclesall Bierlow possibilities, but like you say, square 1.
Thanks

Re: George Wilson bn abt 1842 Bradfield?

Hi Elaine

That`s the correct family Elaine! Robert was one of ten children born to Thomas & Fanny Wilson(nee ibbotson)

Zachariah(b1823)& Ann Wilson(nee Crawshaw) move their family over to the southside of the city to work for John Camm at his brickyard on Meadowhead.

Will

Re: George Wilson bn abt 1842 Bradfield?

Hi Will,

Could you contact off the Forum please as I think we may have Links through Zachariah(1823)

Fingers crossed.

Elaine.

Re: George Wilson bn abt 1842 Bradfield?

Terry,

Where did George get his money from to be able to buy the Farm?

The 1871 census page for George is a mess.

It states his place of birth as Sheffield/Bradford & finally Bradfield.
with a wife Mary. He is listed as a Licensed Victualler.

I never did follow through with my own Licensed Victuallers...... so there could be more info on that GW.but where.

I was beginning to think that when it was stated that they had relatives in Yorkshire they could have been mistaken and it was just the CRAPPER line.

BUT George does say that in 1877 when he went to the States. Something fishy going on I would like to bet.

Was George Still married to someone else.

Elaine.

Re: George Wilson bn abt 1842 Bradfield?

The 1871 Census George Wilson 30, Publican (b Damflask) + Mary 42 (b Woolwich) are together in the 1881 census in Sheffield viz George 61 Licensed Vic b Bradfield + Mary 54 b Woolwich.

I explain the age mix up as the enumerator in 1871 misreading his notes and putting 30 instead of 50.

In UK censuses the only time rounding was done was 1841, and that was rounding DOWN to final digit 5 or 0

However you explain the 31 year age change in 10 years the George Wilson, publican in Barkers Pool 1n 1871 was still in sheffield in 1881, while the correct George was in Kansas.
Dave

Re: George Wilson bn abt 1842 Bradfield?

It would appear that 'all is not well within the state of Bradfield', errors, mix ups ifs & buts etc leaving us with conjecture & little more pre emigration on this ghost. I think E is quite right on the fishy undertones, interesting. Onwards & upwards for me then. Many thanks.
T

Re: George Wilson bn abt 1842 Bradfield?

In answer to Elaines query:
"Where did George get his money from to be able to buy the Farm?"
The answer is he did not need money. He would get the land free under the Homestead Act of 1862.

On GRO index there is a George Wilson birth reg q3 1842 in CHARD (covers parts of east Devon), MMN Pyke.
He can be found on the
1851 census in YARCOMBE (son of David Ag Lab and Mary) and born in Yarcombe,
1861 census in MEMBURY, a servant to a FARMER (but with shoe repair skills).
1871 census he is married and living in Stockland (Axminster Devon) with wife Elizabeth. They have been married since 1864 and no children. His widowed mother Mary is visiting with them.

I can find no later trace of George or Elizaberth.
His mother is back at her long term address in Yarcombe in 1881.
Seems like a potential contender for a George Wilson born August 1842 who may travel to USA from Plymouth and become a farmer.
Worthy of further investigation!!
Dave

Re: George Wilson bn abt 1842 Bradfield?

Good morning & thank you. Homestead act most interesting & will look at Chard G for the missing links. Just a quick update, the father of my contact, still living, knew IRA, one of the 1st generation migrants from whom much of their knowledge comes.