The GRO site shows John Martin Pass birth as 1841 no mothers maiden is given which makes me think he was illegitimate. The baptism in 1847 could mean he was 6 years old which isn't unusual.
Elaine, Are you still able to view the original of the 1847 baptism of John Martin? What does the note about Godparents mean please?
Are George and Sarah the parents or the godparents?
There is a very confusing Pass family in St Johns on the 1851 census. (Search Hannah Pass born 1789 to find it).
Hannah (widow, 62) has a son Martin (17), a daughter Sarah Conquest (30) with her husband George Conquest(32). They married in 1844 and they remained childless in later censuses. Other people in the household are a widowed daughter Emma Shaw and her son Martin Shaw and 2 more grandchildren of Hannah, Harriet Pass, 14 and John Pass 2. Strangely, this John is said to be a scholar (at 2 years old?)
Also a Martin Pass age 52 died in the area in Q4 1842, presumably Hannah's husband.
I am wondering if John Martin was illegitimate son of Sarah who married Goerge Conquest in 1844 then they "adopted" him by baptism in 1847.
This is the information from the CONQUEST/PASS marriage.
29 Oct 1844. Sheffield Parish Church SS Peter & Paul.
George CONQUEST aged 24 a bachelor, Labourer of South St, Park Father: John CONQUEST a Hatter.
Sarah PASS aged 21 a spinster of South St, Park. Father: Martin PASS.Cutler
George signed and Sarah made her mark "X"
Witnesses Joseph STOKES and J.Hudson. the latter being a clerk at the church and signed as witness on numerous certificates.
It looks increasingly likely that Dave has hit the nail on the head, with the 1851 census. The birth certificate has to be the next step.
Elaine, Are you still able to view the original of the 1847 baptism of John Martin? What does the note about Godparents mean please?
Are George and Sarah the parents or the godparents?
There is a very confusing Pass family in St Johns on the 1851 census. (Search Hannah Pass born 1789 to find it).
Hannah (widow, 62) has a son Martin (17), a daughter Sarah Conquest (30) with her husband George Conquest(32). They married in 1844 and they remained childless in later censuses. Other people in the household are a widowed daughter Emma Shaw and her son Martin Shaw and 2 more grandchildren of Hannah, Harriet Pass, 14 and John Pass 2. Strangely, this John is said to be a scholar (at 2 years old?)
Also a Martin Pass age 52 died in the area in Q4 1842, presumably Hannah's husband.
I am wondering if John Martin was illegitimate son of Sarah who married Goerge Conquest in 1844 then they "adopted" him by baptism in 1847.
Is that a long shot too far?
Dave
Hi Dave,
To answer your long shot I think you have hit the nail right on the head......
Now to your first question.......
I dont have the originals anymore but the database covers all baptisms and the RC ones have godparents/sponsors listed. NOT the C of E baptisms.
Notes: are for any other info that might be in the records. i.e.Some of the RC ones have who they later married.
Hi Karen
Caroline's father, Alfred Ellison, was my 3xg grandfather. Her mother was Harriet (nee Mappin). Alfred and Harriet had around ten children. My 2xg grandmother Sarah, was Caroline's younger sister. Just a bit more for your family tree! Deb
Thanks for this info. I have some census(1841 and 1851) and trade directory information(when Alfred was a licenced victualler) for the Ellison's but I didn't know Harriet's Maiden name!