toolbar powered by Conduit

Visit The New Etater!

Forum is moving to new host!

Etater Public Forum
This Forum is Locked
Author
Comment
Grand Jury Rejects Alderman

From the 12-3-09 Pocahontas Times:

"The grand jury returned a no true bill in a case presented by Norman Alderman Tuesday afternoon. The case concerned the alleged misuse of funds for the PCHS golf team in 2005."

There is an old saying that "A grand jury will indict a wet rag." Which means that if even a scintilla or mere shread of evidence is presented to the grand jury, they will return an indictment. When a "no true bill" is returned, the grand jury is saying that even if they believed the evidence presented (by Alderman) and that was the ONLY evidence presented, they would not convict. In short, Norman doesn't have any case here. Anyone surprised?

Re: Grand Jury Rejects Alderman

Way to go Norman.

You should have retained Joel (the Perry Mason of Pocahontas County) as co-counsel.

Re: Grand Jury Rejects Alderman

Not a surprise at all. Remember how Normie kept boldly predicting that he would win his suit against the BOE? LOL

Gotta love seeing him brought back to earth for a healthy dose of reality. LOL

People are getting a glimpse of Norman as the kook that he really is.

Watch him now rant how unfair our judicial system is. Crooked judges, blah, blah, blah. Everyone is corrupt & against Norman. LOL This should be funny.

Re: Grand Jury Rejects Alderman

What’s next Norman (Maxwell Smart)?

Wilfong and his rubber checks or possibly Totten (Red Neck Pimp) and his alleged sexual assault?

Re: Grand Jury Rejects Alderman

yea who cares and you keep thinking you will win a war of wits with me.ill bet you brag about it to your family of the evening and to the sheep heard at night. had the role been reversed you probally would of been thinking you would of won .who would file a law suit thinking you will loose?norm lost big deal.i could care less you however like to grind peoples nose into things like you think your are superior to others .ill bet you got pleasure from the fact he lost didnt you.

Superintendent Confesses That the Money was Misappropriated

We will win! James Patrick Law admitted that he misappropriated this money. He took money that was intended to purchase golf bags for the kids but instead gave it to Walt Helmick's former employee, Jimmy Cutlip. It was a "severance" package for the good water bottler after he broke up with Helmick's business.

Did you ever wonder how it is that the "travel expenses" amounted to exactly $2,500 to the "penny". Now that's what I call accurate accounting.

But down worry! We have more irons in the fire on this including federal court. We will not stop until the truth is told!

See this link for proof:

Superintendent Confesses to Misappropriating the Golf Money--Confession on Page Four

Re: Superintendent Confesses That the Money was Misappropriated

Sideshow: Get a life and go back to Elem. School and learn how to read and write. I bet you didn't make through 4th grade and if you did it was a result of the teacher was tired of dealing with your BS negative attitude.

Re: Superintendent Confesses That the Money was Misappropriated

Norman was given his time on the stand by Special Prosecutor Via. But after Norman was excused he was told to leave the room and Via instructed the Grand Jury not to sign the true bill on this indictment. Thus, Norman was appeased because he got to speak to the Grand Jury and Via was able to squash the case.

Re: Superintendent Confesses That the Money was Misappropriated

het wva a its you again .sorry i made it slightly more but you and who cares are only guessing 1 greade apart from eachother .but you are both wrong.maybe you should call the 45 th air space wing you know nasa and ask them if they still have a copy of my records on hand you know how they like to hire us dummies with 4 th grade educations to work on the shuttle program the delta and eelv programs.i guess if id had your education i might have been able to get a good job.guess thats why all the work i could get for cisco systems and bell atlantic and in the pharmicutal industry and areospace industry must seem like nothing to someone with your great education.to bad they only hire us dummies with 4 grade educations its really embarrasing .tell me where you have worked id like to know so you can embarass me even more in public .its a shame that my biggest accomplishment was being in charge of a process we did on the shuttles fuel system and a few componets i did in my cleanroom lab at the time and some in the feild that went to space.im sure your achivements overshadow mine by far and will make me look foolish.as for being negtive i was no everyone was attacking norm for doing what anyone of us would have done and ive noticed that some of you enjoying it when others have problems mainly you and who cares.you both seem to hate norm but yet cant stay off his site attacking everyone like a little bee who mad.i could care less that norm my have lost his case because he will go at it again he shall not give up easy .if he wins he wins if not so be it but ill not relish in either .i gain no pleasure by others suffering as some on here do.and if you were to ask norm he will tell you im not on his hit parade buddy list i assure you of that we dont see eye to eye but do agree on some things .wonder if hes opnion of you is the same as mine ?sadly i cant use that word here on etater .somehow i know norm among many others here will agree .what say you people of e tater is he or is he not?

Re: Grand Jury Rejects Alderman

sideshowbob
yea who cares and you keep thinking you will win a war of wits with me.ill bet you brag about it to your family of the evening and to the sheep heard at night. had the role been reversed you probally would of been thinking you would of won .who would file a law suit thinking you will loose?norm lost big deal.i could care less you however like to grind peoples nose into things like you think your are superior to others .ill bet you got pleasure from the fact he lost didnt you.


So, sideshow....are you going to start chasing me around in every thread I post in? I never addressed you or even mentioned you in this thread yet here you are whining again. And you said something about "ME" beating a dead horse??? Why are you dragging this rubbish into this thread? Oh boy, you worked for NASA. Even the largest companies in the world need janitors. I mean we know that with your reading skills, you weren't given a job that requires a lot of reading comprehension. That doesn't leave much.

And what is your thing about sheep? Never mind, I don't want to know.

As for Norman, well, yes, I'm laughing my butt off that he lost. I've seen how Norman operates. Throw out some gossip & inuendos before checking his facts & watching the feeding frenzy on this board as inocent people & families get their name drug through the mud. I've seen the lies & half-truths he spews. So, yes, I take great joy in seeing him get his. That's really NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS!

As I said in another thread bob...put it to rest. Go smoke a doobie & chill out!

Re: Grand Jury Rejects Alderman

sorry who care i dont smoke weed have not for several years.yes ill follow you everywhere get acustomed to it.i have 3 to 4 days off every week so your now my offical project.

Re: Grand Jury Rejects Alderman

sideshowbob
sorry who care i dont smoke weed have not for several years.yes ill follow you everywhere get acustomed to it.i have 3 to 4 days off every week so your now my offical project.


Whatever bob. All I have to say is that you need to be considerate of the other posters on this board. Do you think they deserve you ruining every thread with your imature rants?

Re: Grand Jury Rejects Alderman

only where your concerned who cares .

contact e-tater@hotmail.com

Top And Bottom Banners Available, Contact Us For Details!