With these outlandish tickets being given, I am beginning to wonder if the radars need re-calibrated! Has anyone else observed a problem or knows of unusually high readings in limited driving situations. The lad who got the ticket in Huntersville couldn't have been trying to make that turn at 51 mph! And if someone actually was doing 80 mph or so in a 45 they would have to be quite reckless. What I think is happening is that the radars are off!!!

Maybe J.L. knows something that we don't!!!

Norman,

I would be willing to bet that every officer has to be certifided to use both radar equipment and breath-alizers. And I would guess that they have to take refresher courses from time to time.

I would also be willing to bet that every piece of each of these pieces of equipment has to be tested and recalibrated from time to time to certify that they work properly.

I know of a woman who was arrested for having a 0.082 alcohol level. 0.080 is considered too high, but what would the readings be if they had been taken 10 times in a row?

Now for sure I am against drunk driving totally, but what is the error level of such an instrument? Could it be that her level was really lower and that a warning or lecture was more warranted?

So Norman perhaps you could find out if every officer is certified and current to use these instruments and if every instrument has error perameters and is also current in its performance .

Thank you Joel. We'll work on it!

I watched a tv show a couple of years ago on how to beat a speeding ticket, and they said after the cop gives you a ticket, ask to see the calibration cert. They said radars had to be calibrated every 6 months, and if the cop couldn't present it you could beat it. The reason they said to wait until after you know your getting citation was that if you asked before you were guarnteed to get a citation.

ARE YOUR RADAR UNITS TRULY CERTIFIED???

Calibration, by definition, requires adjusting a radar unit to meet a manufacturer’s set of specifications on frequency and power of the microwave and setting levels in the amplifier and display circuitry. Proper calibration will result in the greatest possible performance of a radar unit. Also it will provide documentation in court that the radar meets its manufacturer’s design specifications and all applicable government specifications.

Calibration is achieved by a process of aligning the microwave frequency, power, and receiver sensitivity. The microwave is the transmitter and receiver of a radar. After the desired levels have been achieved in the microwave, another process of checking out the amplifier and displaying circuits follows. In most models, this requires some tuning for maximum performance.

Calibration to manufacturer’s specifications can only be achieved by disassembling the radar and aligning each of these stages as the manufacturer requires. This process requires thousands of dollars of test equipment and years of experience and training. Proper and true calibration can only be achieved by this process.

The Law Of Radar Calibration

Every state here in the United States requires by law, every law enforcement agency be it local, city, state or federal, to either annually or semi-annually send out every police radar unit in that departments inventory to an independent laboratory for a complete inspection and certification. The purpose of this is quite obvious; we want to be sure that every piece of police radar being used be in proper working order so that mistakes are not made and speeding tickets not issued in error or unjustly. Ok, so how does all of this work and why does it matter?

First, we want an independent inspection performed which will assure the integrity of the inspection. We do not want the police to police themselves, which is why state law requires an independent laboratory conduct the inspections. All states require the yearly or semi-yearly inspections. Secondly the law requires that each and every law enforcement agency deliver to any laboratory that has been government certified to conduct these inspections, their departments police radar units. Thirdly, the law requires that every police radar unit in that departments inventory be sent out within that states yearly guidelines. The majority of law enforcement agencies all across the United States fail to confirm to these standards as required by law. This is why I feel that 3 out of every 5 speeding tickets has been issued either unjustly or in error of some kind.
I Conduct A Survey...

In the summer of the year 2003 I began to conduct a survey of various local, city and state law enforcement agencies all across the United States. I interviewed either on the telephone or in person a department member of each of these law enforcement agencies, which totaled over 150 departments. The survey took months and months to complete but nonetheless it was finished late in 2004. The focus of this survey was quite simple actually; I was looking to find the answers to two questions in two subject areas. The first question revolved around finding out how many police radar units any given department had, followed up with did each and every radar unit get sent out for inspection as required by that states law. The second question was a follow-up question based on the answer to the first about the number of units any given department had in its inventory. What I attempted to elicit from the department official I interviewed was if that department sent an officer to court with calibration and inspection paperwork from a police radar unit that they knew not to be from the unit the police officer was operating at the time the speeding ticket he was going to court for was issued. The answers to these questions in these subject areas were just startling and left me in complete disbelief.
The Survey Says...

Out of the over 150 different local, city and state law enforcement agencies that I interviewed, I learned that 127 or the majority of these agencies had in their departments inventory police radar units that were routinely being used yet had not been sent out within the mandated annual or semi-annual inspection period. Further, 107 of these law enforcement agencies admitted that their officers went to court with calibration and inspection paperwork from a police radar unit that may have been different from the one they were operating when the speeding ticket they are now appearing in court on was issued. Many times I was told, the officers were not aware of what I called the “bait & switch” of the calibration and inspection paperwork. These officers would go into court and testify under oath that the paperwork they brought with them that day into court was in fact from the actual police radar unit they were using when they issued the speeding ticket that was the subject of the court case they were now testifying about. Let me explain how and what this information means to all of you who receive a speeding ticket and plan to fight back in court. This piece of information alone could be the one thing that makes your case and breaks the states case against you.

The easiest way to sum up what I learned from this independent survey was to just use my own police department as an example. Many of you are well aware that I am a retired police officer from the State of Connecticut with over 14 years of loyal and faithful service. I was forced to retire in 1996 due to a line of duty injury, which caused me a permanent disability. My own department had about 6 radar units in our inventory. We would send out 1 or 2 of those 6 radar units to be inspected and certified by an independent laboratory each and every year as required by Connecticut Law, yet we would use all 6 of those radar units all the time. Many of our radar units had not been sent out for inspection in years. If and when we had to appear in court on a speeding ticket matter, my department provided to me paperwork from whatever radar unit had been sent out for calibration and certification that year, even though it may have not been the unit I was using when I stopped the motorist for speeding who was now appealing his ticket in court. Oftentimes I knew I had paperwork from a different unit and other times I did not. As is the case in most states, it takes months and months for a speeding ticket matter to be brought up in court for trial and by that time many officers forget which piece of police radar they were using when they made that traffic stop and issued the speeding ticket. It is this reason most officers are unaware they are going to court with paperwork that may not necessarily be from the unit they were using many months ago. So just using my own department for example, if we only calibrated 2 out of the 6 police radar units in our inventory each and every year as required by law, then every speeding ticket issued with those 4 police radar units that were never sent out for inspection and certification were issued either illegally or unjustly, thus bringing me back to why I believe that 3 out of 5 speeding tickets issued every day in the United States was issued unlawfully. This "bait & switch" practice did not just occur in my own department, based on the survey I conducted it appears as though it takes places in the majority of law enforcement agencies all across the United States and most likely everyday.

How This Helps You Beat Your Ticket

Ok, so now we know the truth, that the majority of law enforcement agencies are unlawfully using police radar every day. What does this mean to you, the motorist or to you, the operator who has received a speeding ticket and wants to fight back? It means that you are know armed with true insider information that you can use to help you beat a speeding ticket that was issued with police radar.

Many of us have long suspected that the police do not play fair or by the rules, and the results of my survey clearly point this fact out. Let me tell you how we use this "bait & switch" against those law enforcement agencies who don't play fair or within the scope of the law. If you find yourself on the receiving end of a speeding ticket where police radar was used, the most important piece of information you need to obtain with your discovery request is a list of all models, makes and serial numbers of each and every police radar unit the arresting department has in its inventory along with the calibration and certification paperwork from each unit. You may be met with some resistance but you must be determined to obtain this important list. Seek the assistance of the trial court if you are having difficulty with the arresting law enforcement agency. The obvious reason you want this list is to check and be sure that this department has calibration and certification paperwork for each and every radar unit they have in the inventory. If you discover they have 20 pieces of police radar and only have calibration and certification paperwork for say 15 of those units, that means 5 of their radar units may or are being used in violation of state law guidelines. You want to bring this to the attention of the court. The point you want to make is to get the court to believe this law enforcement agency may have used a radar unit to stop and ticket you that had not been sent out for calibration and certification. You want the court to suspect the department may have used one of those 5 units unlawfully. This creates reasonable doubt in your case and you could easily win a complete dismissal of your speeding ticket.

As I have explained to you in my other three articles as well as in my book entitled "An Educated Guide to Speeding Tickets - How to Beat & Avoid Them!" available for purchase right here BuyRadarDetectors.com, if you are unfortunate to find yourself on the receiving end of a speeding ticket you must remember to remain calm, be polite to the officer, cooperate without admitting any guilt, and do not be afraid to use a good excuse or ask for a written or oral warning from the officer. And always appeal each and every speeding ticket because the odds are in your favor if you fight back and go to court. Over 50% of those who appeal their speeding ticket win in some fashion, be it a compete dismissal or at least a reduction in either the fine or points on their driving record.

For those of you who received a speeding ticket and police radar was used, you must follow my advice and first, appeal your ticket in court, and then request all calibration and certification records from each and every piece of police radar the arresting department has in its inventory. If you follow my advice as discussed in this article, you should be able to raise doubt if you have uncovered a department has not conformed to the calibration and certification laws in your state. You should also follow all of the tips, tactics and strategies I talk about In my book the "Educated Guide to Speeding Tickets." You should do your homework and prepare for your day in court. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need advice. You can contact me via my website or telephone number as found in the "Educated Guide to Speeding Tickets" book again which is available for purchase right here.

I hope you found this article both revealing and easy to understand. Thank you for taking the time and interest in the reading of my articles as well as visiting the buyradardetectors.com web site. May God bless us all and keep us safe upon the highways and byways.

I think that the level of legality when driving on alcohol should be ZERO. That is right, not even one beer. I am strictly against drunk driving. I have very good reasons behind this and one of the reason is of my own doing.

I wrecked a few years back while drinking. I had to spend a long time in ICU, then in the step down unit. That was not my biggest worry, however when I woke up in CMAC strapped to a bed so that I didn't hurt myself while in a coma. I remembered that I also had two passengers with me. I was so scared of what I had done to them. Were they alive? What were there injuries?

Luckily, I was the only one that was seriously hurt. I did learn a huge and valuable lesson. Don't Drink and Drive!

I also have another very sad story that is hard to talk about to this day. This time, my cousin, who loved his kids with all his heart and soul, decided to go to the store which was only 2 miles from his home. He didn't have a babysitter, and the kids mother was at work. He couldn't wait to get a pack of cigarettes so he got the kids in the car. His little boy was 8 at the time and his little girl, 4.

He got her into her car seat and being a daddy's boy, let his son sit in the front with him. He never broke the speed limit, and had only had one 22oz Budweiser about 10 minutes before they left. After getting his smokes and the kids some chocolate bars and a Bug Juice each he started his return trip. Once again he obeyed all speed limits and was driving as safe as he usually did.

Out of the middle of no where a deer jumped out in front of them. His reactions were not as fast as they usually were and he swerved. He couldn't get a grip on the rode and the car skidded off the highway where it struck a tree.

The little girl was shaken up and crying when help got there, but the car seat kept her safe. The dad was frantic, and screaming and breaking down. His son however was motionless, and not breathing. The dad tried everything he could possibly think of to help his son, but the little guy's neck broke on impact. He was wearing a seat belt, but the sudden impact thrust his head back and forth.

This family, my family, was grief stricken and heartbroken. Eventually, the relationship between the mother and father fell apart. The guilt was too much for him to bare and he shot himself.

This is why I think that even one beer is too much. If you have been drinking anything, please think of your passengers, and other motorists and pedestrians first.

I am sorry to have told such a sad but true story, but I think that if I have saved even one person then I have done a good thing. God Bless all the families that have ever experienced a loss of a loved one from something that could have been easily been avoided.

View at EasyCaptures.com

Norman, you really can't be as stupid as you come across can you?

I'll take that as a yes