| Subject: |
|
Re: Re: Re: Consider this |
| Name: |
|
Uri Blass |
| Date Posted: |
|
Jun 19, 07 - 4:27 AM |
| Message: |
|
Hi Wim,
It was the time that I used not including the opponent time.
Here are more details about the times of both opponents(note that the opponents in the tournament that I play play slowly relative to the opponents of another israeli team member that I talked with him.
game 1(I am black draw)
num move,time white,time black in that order:
10 3/16
20 34/106
30 91/168
40 121/230
50 140/300
60 226/327
62 233/327
game 2 (I am white draw)
10 16/14
20 107/50
30 164/102
40 226/216
44 262/230
game 3(I am black win)
10 6/30
20 91/91
30 156/121
40 236/208
46 256/208
game 4:(I am white draw)
10 47/40
20 94/66
30 178/152
38 223/232
game 5:(I am black loss)
10 53/47
20 119/119
30 170/167
40 214/236
game 6:black win thanks to clerical error
10 19/35
note that I started it by mail at 30 days/10 moves and it was one etl against me at move 10(later I simply assumed that I used 60 days for the first 10 moves for calculation of my time and it is practically the same except the case that if I lose on time it is a loss and not ETL)
20 77/111
30 162/161
35 182/190
game 7:I am white (win)
10 46/29
20 112/127=first ETL
25 114/56 after the ETL
game 8:I am black (win)
started by mail and I do not want to look for the exact time of the first moves so I start at move 15.
practically I had only 30 days for the first 10 days and I remember that I used 28 of them for the first 10 moves as black when my opponent used less time.
My opponent did not want to play by email so we started playing by email only at move 16.
15 28/47
20 56/114
30 96/149
40 133/200
50 148/230
51 152/230
Uri |
|
Replies:
|
|
|
|
|