Since 1998...

Play chess with people from all around the world!

Chess Book Store - Correspondence Chess Books, Tournament Booklets and More!

Contact Admin |  TCCMB-A |  TCCMB-B |  Friends of TCCMB |  Completed TCCMB Exhibition Matches  
The Correspondence Chess Place |  The Campbell Report |  Ralph Marconi's Chess Pages  | Interactive Fiction
 TCCMB Photo Album/Contact List | Chess Webmaster Tools | ICCF WebChess Server  | CNN Headline News

TCCMB Chess Quote of the Week
"You can discover more about a person in an hour of play than in a year of conversation."    
Plato

Pending TCCMB Exhibition Matches!  |  TCCMB FAQ/Terms of Use |  Visit CC.COM's Online Store!

TCCMB Video (Windows Media Player)

Hey - We're all at the other forum - come and join us!

  
Welcome to TCCMB. First time users - see the FAQ/Terms of use. In order to post here, you need the password.


Return to Website

  Reply
  Home

Subject:   Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: poor criticism
Name:   Gino
Date Posted:   Jun 9, 07 - 10:06 PM
Message:   I agree with you, there are plenty of players who would enjoy a 10/30 game, me included. I've played many of those in FICGS and never felt any time pressure.
On the other hand, and this is the main objection to your proposal; I also have many games where I make full use of 10/50 time control for various reasons.
I suspect that the reason for delays in some games is not the player's style but other circumstances hard to predict.
Replies:    
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: poor criticism by Wim van Vugt · Jun 10, 07 - 12:09 PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: poor criticism by Nuutti Kuosa · Jun 12, 07 - 1:48 PM
Re: poor criticism by Ron Langeveld · Jun 4, 07 - 11:26 PM
Re: Re: poor criticism by Gino · Jun 6, 07 - 2:54 PM
Re: Re: yet more bad analysis with good math by Dave Taylor · Jun 5, 07 - 7:14 AM


  Reply
  Home


powered by Powered by Bravenet bravenet.com

FAQ/Terms of Use |  Chess Limericks |  Guestbook |  TCCMB Links | |  Play Java Blitz Now!