Since 1998...

Play chess with people from all around the world!

Chess Book Store - Correspondence Chess Books, Tournament Booklets and More!

Contact Admin |  TCCMB-A |  TCCMB-B |  Friends of TCCMBCompleted TCCMB Exhibition Matches  
The Correspondence Chess Place |  The Campbell Report |  Ralph Marconi's Chess Pages  | Interactive Fiction
 TCCMB Photo Album/Contact List | Chess Webmaster Tools | ICCF WebChess Server  | CNN Headline News

TCCMB Chess Quote of the Week
"Of chess it has been said that life is not long enough for it, but that is the fault of life, not chess."    
William Napier

Pending TCCMB Exhibition Matches!  |  TCCMB FAQ/Terms of Use |  Visit CC.COM's Online Store!

TCCMB Video (Windows Media Player)

Hey - We're all at the other forum - come and join us!

  
Welcome to TCCMB. First time users - see the FAQ/Terms of use. In order to post here, you need the password.


Return to Website

  Reply
  Home

Subject:   Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: More Webserver Rule Madness
Name:   Per Söderberg
Date Posted:   Apr 11, 07 - 10:12 PM
Message:   Hi Gino,
Definitely not. Please note that the reasons for the extra leave could be told to the TD in confidence. The player don't really wish to tell everybody of his illness or simular.

"Special leave is intended to be used primarily for unexpected events such as illnesses, natural disasters and urgent overseas business postings. Recognizing the value of other chess activities special leave may be granted for attendance at ICCF Congress or OTB tournaments away from a player's home. Events planned in advance such as moving house or job are not valid reasons for special leave."

If the TD accepts the extra leave we shall have the confidence in the TD in that he has valued the reasons and that they fall into the category.
If I had a conspiracy mind, I would guess that those who ask for extra leave must be sure of seeing to that their demand falls in this paragraph. I suppose those who wish to lie about it can say that they will be in surgery and rehabilitation for 2 weeks. But as always as long as I can't prove that they are not telling the truth, I prefer to accept their word on it.

Best, Per
Replies:    
Third party appealing by Per Söderberg · Apr 12, 07 - 5:07 PM
Besides by Per Söderberg · Apr 12, 07 - 7:52 AM
Re: Besides by John Knudsen · Apr 12, 07 - 11:47 AM
Re: Re: Besides by Per Söderberg · Apr 12, 07 - 12:32 PM
Re: Besides by Grayling Hill · Apr 13, 07 - 3:31 PM
Re: Re: Besides by Per Söderberg · Apr 13, 07 - 6:05 PM
Re: Re: Re: Besides by Grayling Hill · Apr 13, 07 - 6:35 PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: Besides by Per Söderberg · Apr 13, 07 - 7:26 PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Besides by Grayling Hill · Apr 13, 07 - 8:32 PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Besides by Per Söderberg · Apr 13, 07 - 8:50 PM
Now I didn't tell you the whole truth. by Per Söderberg · Apr 13, 07 - 8:56 PM
To your points by Per Söderberg · Apr 13, 07 - 8:09 PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: More Webserver Rule Madness by Wolfram Schön · Apr 11, 07 - 7:14 PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: More Webserver Rule Madness by Wolfram Schön · Apr 12, 07 - 12:02 PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: More Webserver Rule Madness by Wolfram Schön · Apr 14, 07 - 12:03 PM
Re: Re: More Webserver Rule Madness by Per Söderberg · Apr 11, 07 - 11:31 AM
Re: Re: Re: More Webserver Rule Madness by Gino · Apr 11, 07 - 3:18 PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: More Webserver Rule Madness by Per Söderberg · Apr 11, 07 - 9:45 PM
Re: More Webserver Rule Madness by Gary · Apr 11, 07 - 12:30 AM
Re: Re: More Webserver Rule Madness by Peter Coleman · Apr 11, 07 - 11:24 AM
Re: Re: Re: More Webserver Rule Madness by John Timm · Apr 12, 07 - 4:28 PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: More Webserver Rule Madness by John Knudsen · Apr 12, 07 - 5:05 PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: More Webserver Rule Madness by Per Söderberg · Apr 12, 07 - 5:26 PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: More Webserver Rule Madness by Per Söderberg · Apr 12, 07 - 5:19 PM


  Reply
  Home


powered by Powered by Bravenet bravenet.com

FAQ/Terms of Use |  Chess Limericks |  Guestbook |  TCCMB Links | |  Play Java Blitz Now!