| Subject: |
|
Re: Question regarding the new ICCF 40 days of silence rule |
| Name: |
|
Wolfram Schön |
| Date Posted: |
|
Apr 10, 07 - 12:39 PM |
| Email (Optional): |
|
ws@chessguru.de |
| Website (Optional): |
|
http://www.chessguru.de |
| Message: |
|
Hi Robin,
I think I had that case.
- tournament started in 2006
- opponent didn't move for more than 40 days in 2007
- I claimed the win
- TD asked opponent for comment
- after considering his reply insufficent the TD granted me the win
- opponent appealed
- AC refused the appeal
I don't want to give the specific details of my case, but the following general statement is clarifing, I think.
From the decision of the AC written by its Chairman Ragnar Wikman on 14 03 07:
>>Once again I have to refer to the fact that 3b of the WEBSERVER rules - for tournaments STARTED BEFORE 01.01.2007 - is much stricter than the email rules.
If more than 40 days has been used and the TD not adequately informed about - AND AGREED TO! - further delays, the game WILL be scored as lost.<<
Emphasis by Mr. Wikman
Best wishes,
Wolfram |
|
Replies:
|
|
|
|
|
Pending TCCMB Exhibition Matches!
| 
TCCMB FAQ/Terms of Use |
Visit CC.COM's Online Store!
TCCMB
Video (Windows Media Player)
Reply
Home
bravenet.com
