Welcome to TCCMB. First time users - see the FAQ/Terms of use. In order to post here, you need the password.

Return to Website

Home

Subject:		Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Question regarding the new ICCF 40 days of silence rule
Name:		Gino
Date Posted:		Apr 10, 07 - 1:24 AM
Message:		Hi Wim, Evidently the 2006 Dresden congress overruled and revoked the 2005 Angostura congress formulation and even pretends that it was already decided in 2005, which can never be the case of course. The latter formulation clearly contradicts the 2006 webserver rules... I disagree. It's possible that some discussions that took place during the 2005 Congress did not succesfully make it to the Minutes. If you check the 2006 Minutes, there is mention of a proposal to clarify rule 3b (item 16. page 21), but the text of the rule is not shown. In my view, after reviewing the 2006 Congress Minutes, the RC intended to provide a guideline, and not a real modification to rule 3b. Best, Gino
Replies:
Re: Question regarding the new ICCF 40 days of silence rule by Wolfram Schön · Apr 10, 07 - 12:39 PM Re: Re: Question regarding the new ICCF 40 days of silence rule by John Knudsen · Apr 10, 07 - 2:10 PM Re: Question regarding the new ICCF 40 days of silence rule by Robin Smith · Apr 10, 07 - 4:29 PM Re: Re: Question regarding the new ICCF 40 days of silence rule by Gary · Apr 11, 07 - 12:46 AM

Home