Since 1998...

Play chess with people from all around the world!

Chess Book Store - Correspondence Chess Books, Tournament Booklets and More!

Contact Admin |  TCCMB-A |  TCCMB-B |  Friends of TCCMB |  Completed TCCMB Exhibition Matches  
The Correspondence Chess Place |  The Campbell Report |  Ralph Marconi's Chess Pages  | Interactive Fiction
 TCCMB Photo Album/Contact List | Chess Webmaster Tools | ICCF WebChess Server  | CNN Headline News

TCCMB Chess Quote of the Week
"We cannot resist the fascination of sacrifice, since a passion for sacrifices is part of a chess player's nature."    
Rudolf Spielmann

Pending TCCMB Exhibition Matches!  |  TCCMB FAQ/Terms of Use |  Visit CC.COM's Online Store!

TCCMB Video (Windows Media Player)

Hey - We're all at the other forum - come and join us!

  
Welcome to TCCMB. First time users - see the FAQ/Terms of use. In order to post here, you need the password.


Return to Website

  Reply
  Home

Subject:   Re: Re: Why not set 40/10 in CL?
Name:   Uri Blass
Date Posted:   Feb 15, 07 - 6:20 AM
Message:   if you want 2 years tournament cycle then even 30/10 is not enough(if both players use their time and play 150 moves the game is going to continue for more than 2 years).

If you want to limit time of the tournament to 2 years then the only solution to force it is to decide about time control of 1 year per side and not 10 moves/x days when it is the decision of the players how to use their time.

Uri
Replies:    
Re: Champions League - cycle time by Peter Coleman · Feb 13, 07 - 7:35 AM
Re: Re: Champions League - cycle time by Ron Langeveld · Feb 13, 07 - 10:06 AM
Re: Re: Champions League - cycle time by Grayling Hill · Feb 13, 07 - 1:17 PM
Re: Re: Re: Champions League - cycle time by Peter Coleman · Feb 14, 07 - 7:51 AM
Re: Re: Re: Champions League - cycle time by Ron Langeveld · Feb 15, 07 - 4:51 PM


  Reply
  Home


powered by Powered by Bravenet bravenet.com

FAQ/Terms of Use |  Chess Limericks |  Guestbook |  TCCMB Links | |  Play Java Blitz Now!