nick

Jan 26, 07 - 11:31 AM

Dangerous Criminals

I would like to be the first to say a big 'you utter cunt' to Judge John Rogers QC for his role in trivializing the crime of paedophilia.

The prisons are full; he gets a note from the home secretary saying that jail should be reserved for only the most dangerous and persistent offenders. Clearly Rogers thinks that paedophiles dont fall into that category and thus fails to jail Derek Williams of Blaenau Ffestiniog, despite the fact that he downloaded dozens of images of child pornography.

The really distrubing thing for me is that Williams was on TV last night defending the judge saying that 'he was only doing his job'. The interview (that you can watch via a link on this webpage http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6301125.stm) shows him sitting at home with his wife. As the camera pans around his lounge, what is clearly visible in his house are kids toys and a photo of a child on the mantle piece. .

FOR FUCKS SAKE!

I AM SHAKING WITH RAGE...

Steve

Jan 26th, 2007 - 2:54 PM

Re: Dangerous Criminals

Hi Nick

Fully agree with you mate and as I have cable TV, I switched to BBC Wales and watched that sick bastard speak more, and wondered how the hell could he, and his wife, sit there and be seen, never mind speak out

All I can say is that perhaps he gets his reward elsewhere and that justice is seen to be done at some time in the future

As for the Judge John Rogers QC ...sick, sick and even more sick and if he thougnt that was having a go at the Home Office and raised his profile..sick!!

Hope to see and chat with you sometime again mate and hope the rage has eased off

Steve

Moonchildhippy

Feb 2nd, 2007 - 6:45 PM

Re: Dangerous Criminals

I do hope that these perverts get what they deserve. If the British so called justice system is failing our kids , then I can see why some people take the law into their own hands. I'm a hippy chick , Love and Peace person, opposed to violence, but when it comes to scumbags such as Derek Williams , then I believe they've forfieted thier basic human rights.

Is the Home Secretary to cowardly to bring in "Sarah's Law", I think he is.

dany boy

Feb 21st, 2007 - 10:39 PM

Re: Dangerous Criminals

Trouble is there are too many of this kind in high places. We all need to weedle them out and expose them. Too many perverts in high places. Can anyone verify this??

DeeDee

Feb 23rd, 2007 - 8:34 AM

Re: Dangerous Criminals

Tis true Danny! there is alot of collusion at the top... Rape and Sexual abuse is a hot tattie... any hint of getting their hands burnt, and its quickly past on

Trydeep

May 19th, 2007 - 3:35 AM

Re: Dangerous Criminals

i want to name Michael Lynott as a 'dangerous criminal' as he abused me vwhen i was about 9 years old. I await his lawer's reply !!!

Ken

Jul 12th, 2007 - 11:55 AM

Re: Dangerous Criminals

Thanks Nick I was trying to remember the Welsh guy's name, I saw the edited interview just with him and couldn't believe he was being so casual.

Idiot liberals wring their hands and say that vigilantism is wrong, well don't fan the flames then...waiting for Williams to commit an actual crime after doing all that looking, is lunacy. Still, at least the BBC has done us the public service of interviewing him, everyone knows what he looks like including parents.

Ken

Jul 12th, 2007 - 11:57 AM

Re: Dangerous Criminals

Correction...he has already committed a crime, I mean waiting to see if Williams took things further than just looking

Ken

Jul 12th, 2007 - 12:00 PM

Re: Dangerous Criminals

OK let's try that correction a third time...Williams has already committed one crime, I meant to say waiting for him to take his looking any further, was lunacy on the part of the judge.

Ken

Jul 12th, 2007 - 7:05 PM

Re: Dangerous Criminals

Oops

Feel free to delete one of the above posts Steve and I won't repost when my browser chucks me off the forum again...

Author	Comment
nick Jan 26, 07 - 11:31 AM	Dangerous Criminals I would like to be the first to say a big 'you utter cunt' to Judge John Rogers QC for his role in trivializing the crime of paedophilia. The prisons are full; he gets a note from the home secretary saying that jail should be reserved for only the most dangerous and persistent offenders. Clearly Rogers thinks that paedophiles dont fall into that category and thus fails to jail Derek Williams of Blaenau Ffestiniog, despite the fact that he downloaded dozens of images of child pornography. The really distrubing thing for me is that Williams was on TV last night defending the judge saying that 'he was only doing his job'. The interview (that you can watch via a link on this webpage http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6301125.stm) shows him sitting at home with his wife. As the camera pans around his lounge, what is clearly visible in his house are kids toys and a photo of a child on the mantle piece. . FOR FUCKS SAKE! I AM SHAKING WITH RAGE...
Steve Jan 26th, 2007 - 2:54 PM	Re: Dangerous Criminals Hi Nick Fully agree with you mate and as I have cable TV, I switched to BBC Wales and watched that sick bastard speak more, and wondered how the hell could he, and his wife, sit there and be seen, never mind speak out All I can say is that perhaps he gets his reward elsewhere and that justice is seen to be done at some time in the future As for the Judge John Rogers QC ...sick, sick and even more sick and if he thougnt that was having a go at the Home Office and raised his profile..sick!! Hope to see and chat with you sometime again mate and hope the rage has eased off Steve
Moonchildhippy Feb 2nd, 2007 - 6:45 PM	Re: Dangerous Criminals I do hope that these perverts get what they deserve. If the British so called justice system is failing our kids , then I can see why some people take the law into their own hands. I'm a hippy chick , Love and Peace person, opposed to violence, but when it comes to scumbags such as Derek Williams , then I believe they've forfieted thier basic human rights. Is the Home Secretary to cowardly to bring in "Sarah's Law", I think he is.
dany boy Feb 21st, 2007 - 10:39 PM	Re: Dangerous Criminals Trouble is there are too many of this kind in high places. We all need to weedle them out and expose them. Too many perverts in high places. Can anyone verify this??
DeeDee Feb 23rd, 2007 - 8:34 AM	Re: Dangerous Criminals Tis true Danny! there is alot of collusion at the top... Rape and Sexual abuse is a hot tattie... any hint of getting their hands burnt, and its quickly past on
Trydeep May 19th, 2007 - 3:35 AM	Re: Dangerous Criminals i want to name Michael Lynott as a 'dangerous criminal' as he abused me vwhen i was about 9 years old. I await his lawer's reply !!!
Ken Jul 12th, 2007 - 11:55 AM	Re: Dangerous Criminals Thanks Nick I was trying to remember the Welsh guy's name, I saw the edited interview just with him and couldn't believe he was being so casual. Idiot liberals wring their hands and say that vigilantism is wrong, well don't fan the flames then...waiting for Williams to commit an actual crime after doing all that looking, is lunacy. Still, at least the BBC has done us the public service of interviewing him, everyone knows what he looks like including parents.
Ken Jul 12th, 2007 - 11:57 AM	Re: Dangerous Criminals Correction...he has already committed a crime, I mean waiting to see if Williams took things further than just looking
Ken Jul 12th, 2007 - 12:00 PM	Re: Dangerous Criminals OK let's try that correction a third time...Williams has already committed one crime, I meant to say waiting for him to take his looking any further, was lunacy on the part of the judge.
Ken Jul 12th, 2007 - 7:05 PM	Re: Dangerous Criminals Oops Feel free to delete one of the above posts Steve and I won't repost when my browser chucks me off the forum again...